EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro has the longer modeled runtime
Both stations pass the available continuous and startup checks. EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro estimates 2d 2h; Jackery Explorer 600 v2 estimates 1d 18h.
Scenario-anchored comparison
Same device load, same runtime assumptions, and source-backed station specs. This is a planning estimate, not a measured runtime test.
Wi-Fi router: 12 W · 100%
Both stations pass the available continuous and startup checks. EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro estimates 2d 2h; Jackery Explorer 600 v2 estimates 1d 18h.
A runtime shown beside a failed or unknown fit is conditional: it applies only if the load starts and stays within the station limits.
| Key facts | Jackery Explorer 600 v2 | EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Modeled runtime | 1d 18h | 2d 2h |
| Overall load fit | Pass | Pass |
| Battery capacity | 640 Wh | 768 Wh |
| AC output | 500 W | 800 W |
| AC output · Fit | Pass | Pass |
| Device startup demand | Not required | Not required |
| Surge output | 1,000 W | 1,600 W |
| Surge output · Fit | Not required | Not required |
The same source-backed load and calculation assumptions are used for both stations.
Open the parent records before using this estimate for a purchase or backup plan.
Use these as planning shortcuts, then confirm the full table and sources.
Router wattage is usually steady, but modem, ONT, and mesh nodes should be counted as separate loads.