Wi-Fi router
Uses 12 W and 100% duty cycle for both stations.
Source-aware comparison
Jackery Explorer 600 v2 vs EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro
A source-backed comparison with neutral, spec-derived verdicts. Unknown fields stay visible, and both stations use the same runtime assumptions.
Compare This Pair For A Real Load
Scenario pages apply one source-backed device load to both stations before you inspect the full table.
Jackery Explorer 600 v2
640 Wh, 500 W AC output.
Confidence: verified. Last verified: 2026-06-24.
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro
768 Wh, 800 W AC output.
Confidence: verified. Last verified: 2026-06-24.
Capacity
Capacity: RIVER 2 Pro is higher by 128 Wh.
AC Output
AC output: RIVER 2 Pro is higher by 300 W.
Solar Input
Solar input: RIVER 2 Pro is higher by 20 W.
The 60 W runtime estimate assumes AC output, 85% conversion efficiency, and 10% battery reserve. It is a sanity check, not a lab-tested result.
Which one, when?
These verdicts are computed only from tracked specs. They do not use price, affiliate status, ads, sponsorships, or untracked preferences.
Best for longer runtime margin
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro leads this tracked field: 768 Wh vs Jackery Explorer 600 v2 at 640 Wh (+128 Wh).
Best for higher AC loads
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro leads this tracked field: 800 W vs Jackery Explorer 600 v2 at 500 W (+300 W).
Best for startup surge headroom
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro leads this tracked field: 1,600 W vs Jackery Explorer 600 v2 at 1,000 W (+600 W).
Best for faster solar refill
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro leads this tracked field: 220 W vs Jackery Explorer 600 v2 at 200 W (+20 W).
Best for portability
Jackery Explorer 600 v2 leads this tracked field: 6.4 kg vs EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro at 8.3 kg (+1.8 kg).
Use the cards as planning shortcuts, then confirm the full spec table and source links below. A larger number is not automatically better for every use case.
Runtime Examples
Same assumptions on both sides: AC output, 85% efficiency, 10% reserve, healthy battery, and steady load.
Swipe table sideways
| Example load | Explorer 600 v2 | RIVER 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 60 W AC essentials | 8h 10m | 9h 48m |
| 120 W AC small appliance | 4h 5m | 4h 54m |
| 700 W AC kitchen or tool load | above AC rating | 50m |
Swipe table sideways
| Spec | Explorer 600 v2 | RIVER 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 640 Wh | 768 Wh |
| Battery chemistry | LiFePO4 | LFP |
| AC output | 500 W | 800 W |
| Surge output | 1,000 W | 1,600 W |
| DC output | 120 W | 126 W |
| USB-C output | 100 W | 100 W |
| Solar input | 200 W | 220 W |
| Weight | 6.4 kg | 8.25 kg |
| 60 W AC estimate | 8h 10m | 9h 48m |
| Confidence | verified | verified |
| Last verified | 2026-06-24 | 2026-06-24 |
Planning Watch-Outs
These checks explain where the comparison is strong and where it still needs better source coverage.
- 5 of 5 high-impact comparison fields are filled on both sides.
- RIVER 2 Pro has the larger nominal battery capacity, but usable Wh still depends on reserve, efficiency, temperature, and battery age.
- Explorer 600 v2 is lighter in the tracked weight data, which matters if the station is moved often.
- RIVER 2 Pro has the higher tracked solar input, assuming compatible panels and charge-voltage limits.
Sources
Comparison rows come directly from the linked model records.
Explorer 600 v2
- Jackery Explorer 600 v2 product page (official; checked 2026-06-24)
- Jackery Explorer 600 v2 use-case guide (official; checked 2026-06-24)
RIVER 2 Pro
- EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro specifications (official; checked 2026-06-24)
How to read this comparison
Use this page as a source-backed spec and runtime planning comparison. It is not a full buying guide, and it does not rank products by price, affiliate terms, or sponsorship.