WattRunTime.com
Language

Scenario-anchored comparison

Anker SOLIX C300 vs EcoFlow RIVER 3 for Wi-Fi router

Same device load, same runtime assumptions, and source-backed station specs. This is a planning estimate, not a measured runtime test.

Scenario verdict

Wi-Fi router: 12 W · 100%

Anker SOLIX C300 has the longer modeled runtime

Both stations pass the available continuous and startup checks. Anker SOLIX C300 estimates 19h 0m; EcoFlow RIVER 3 estimates 16h 10m.

Anker SOLIX C300

  • Overall load fit: Pass
  • AC output: 300 W · Fit: Pass
  • Surge output: 600 W · Fit: Not required
  • Modeled runtime: 19h 0m

EcoFlow RIVER 3

  • Overall load fit: Pass
  • AC output: 300 W · Fit: Pass
  • Surge output: 600 W · Fit: Not required
  • Modeled runtime: 16h 10m

Specification comparison

A runtime shown beside a failed or unknown fit is conditional: it applies only if the load starts and stays within the station limits.

Swipe table sideways
Specification comparison
Key factsAnker SOLIX C300EcoFlow RIVER 3
Modeled runtime19h 0m16h 10m
Overall load fitPassPass
Battery capacity288 Wh245 Wh
AC output300 W300 W
AC output · FitPassPass
Device startup demandNot requiredNot required
Surge output600 W600 W
Surge output · FitNot requiredNot required

Planning inputs and evidence

The same source-backed load and calculation assumptions are used for both stations.

Load assumptions

  • Typical wattage range: 8-20 W
  • Planning default: 12 W
  • Device startup demand: Not required
  • Average load: 100%
  • AC output: AC · 88%
  • Reserve: 10%
  • Confidence: Estimated

Check sources and assumptions

Open the parent records before using this estimate for a purchase or backup plan.

Wi-Fi router

Router wattage is usually steady, but modem, ONT, and mesh nodes should be counted as separate loads.