AC180 runs longer here
BLUETTI AC180 estimates 1d 5h, while Jackery Explorer 1000 v2 estimates 1d 3h.
Scenario-anchored comparison
Same device load, same runtime assumptions, and source-backed station specs. This is a planning estimate, not a measured runtime test.
The runtime check uses 50 W, 60% duty cycle, AC output, 85% efficiency, and 10% reserve on both sides.
BLUETTI AC180 estimates 1d 5h, while Jackery Explorer 1000 v2 estimates 1d 3h.
12V portable cooler: 35-75 W typical range, 50 W planning default.
| Field | BLUETTI AC180 | Jackery Explorer 1000 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Scenario runtime estimate | 1d 5h | 1d 3h |
| Battery capacity | 1,152 Wh | 1,070 Wh |
| AC output | 1,800 W | 1,500 W |
| Surge output | 2,700 W | 3,000 W |
Use the parent records to inspect sources, confidence labels, and assumptions.
Capacity, output, solar input, weight, source links, and neutral spec verdicts.
Typical wattage range, duty cycle, scenario notes, and source references.