Anker SOLIX F3800
3,840 Wh, 6,000 W AC output.
Lifecycle status: Unknown. Confidence: Verified. Last verified: 2026-06-24.
Menu
Source-aware comparison
Anker SOLIX F3800 vs Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000
A source-backed comparison with neutral, spec-derived verdicts. Unknown fields stay visible, and both stations use the same runtime assumptions.
Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000
3,994 Wh, 3,600 W AC output.
Lifecycle status: Unknown. Confidence: Verified. Last verified: 2026-06-24.
Capacity
Capacity: Yeti PRO 4000 is higher by 153.6 Wh.
AC Output
AC output: F3800 is higher by 2,400 W.
Solar Input
Solar input: Yeti PRO 4000 is higher by 600 W.
The 60 W runtime estimate assumes AC output, 85% conversion efficiency, and 10% battery reserve. It is a sanity check, not a lab-tested result. This label describes availability in the cited region only. It does not imply that another model is universally better, compatible, or an official replacement.
Which one, when?
These verdicts are computed only from tracked specs. They do not use price, affiliate status, ads, sponsorships, or untracked preferences.
Best for longer runtime margin
Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 leads this tracked field: 3,994 Wh vs Anker SOLIX F3800 at 3,840 Wh (+154 Wh).
Best for higher AC loads
Anker SOLIX F3800 leads this tracked field: 6,000 W vs Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 at 3,600 W (+2,400 W).
Best for startup surge headroom
Anker SOLIX F3800 leads this tracked field: 9,000 W vs Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 at 7,200 W (+1,800 W).
Best for faster solar refill
Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 leads this tracked field: 3,000 W vs Anker SOLIX F3800 at 2,400 W (+600 W).
Best for portability
Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 leads this tracked field: 52.5 kg vs Anker SOLIX F3800 at 60 kg (+7.5 kg).
Use the cards as planning shortcuts, then confirm the full spec table and source links below. A larger number is not automatically better for every use case.
Runtime Examples
Same assumptions on both sides: AC output, 85% efficiency, 10% reserve, healthy battery, and steady load.
Swipe table sideways
| Example load | F3800 | Yeti PRO 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 60 W AC essentials | 2d 0h | 2d 2h |
| 120 W AC small appliance | 1d 0h | 1d 1h |
| 700 W AC kitchen or tool load | 4h 12m | 4h 22m |
Swipe table sideways
| Spec | F3800 | Yeti PRO 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 3,840 Wh | 3,994 Wh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | LiFePO4 |
| AC output | 6,000 W | 3,600 W |
| Surge output | 9,000 W | 7,200 W |
| DC output | 120 W | 405 W |
| USB-C output | 100 W | 100 W |
| Solar input | 2,400 W | 3,000 W |
| Weight | 60 kg | 52.5 kg |
| Lifecycle status | Unknown | Unknown |
| 60 W AC estimate | 2d 0h | 2d 2h |
| Confidence | Verified | Verified |
| Last verified | 2026-06-24 | 2026-06-24 |
Planning Watch-Outs
These checks explain where the comparison is strong and where it still needs better source coverage.
- 5 of 5 high-impact comparison fields are filled on both sides.
- Yeti PRO 4000 has the larger nominal battery capacity, but usable Wh still depends on reserve, efficiency, temperature, and battery age.
- Yeti PRO 4000 is lighter in the tracked weight data, which matters if the station is moved often.
- Yeti PRO 4000 has the higher tracked solar input, assuming compatible panels and charge-voltage limits.
Sources
Comparison rows come directly from the linked model records.
F3800
- Anker SOLIX F3800 product page (official; checked 2026-06-24)
- Anker SOLIX F3800 product description (official; checked 2026-06-24)
Yeti PRO 4000
- Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 product page (official; checked 2026-06-24)
- Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 home backup specs (official; checked 2026-06-24)
How to read this comparison
Use this page as a source-backed spec and runtime planning comparison. It is not a full buying guide, and it does not rank products by price, affiliate terms, or sponsorship.